Conversation

Media coverage of artists often veers away from celebrating their creative achievements, focusing instead on personal details that are frequently distorted or unverified.

This shift in focus undermines the purpose of artistic expression, reducing an artist’s body of work to tabloid fodder rather than a meaningful contribution to culture.

One of the most prominent examples of this phenomenon is the use of stage names, an industry-wide practice designed to offer artists privacy while shaping a distinct public persona.

However, what is intended to protect is sometimes misrepresented as deceptive, with media narratives labeling these choices as evasive or dishonest.

​

Many celebrated artists have adopted, and sometimes even legally changed, their names as part of their journey to define an artistic identity separate from their personal lives.

For instance, Lana Del Rey was born Elizabeth Grant, but she adopted her stage name to evoke a cinematic and nostalgic aesthetic, one that aligned with her music's melancholic yet glamorous style.

Similarly, Freddie Mercury was born Farrokh Bulsara, but as the iconic frontman of Queen, his chosen name became synonymous with a bold, fearless persona.

Other examples include Miley Cyrus, who transformed from Destiny Hope Cyrus, and Elton John, who left behind the name Reginald Kenneth Dwight.

These changes are not mere cosmetic shifts—they are deliberate decisions to control how the public perceives the artist, allowing for personal privacy and artistic freedom.

Yet, despite these well-known practices, media outlets often misinterpret the use of stage names, framing them as dishonest or misleading, when in fact they are acts of self-preservation.

​

The scrutiny doesn’t end with names. Where social media dictates the flow of public information, artists are (unfairly) pressured to constantly share intimate details of their lives, whether through selfies, personal stories, or interviews.

When they decline, they are often labeled as aloof or secretive.

Even the use of AI-driven photo editing tools (example Lensa AI) has sparked debates about authenticity, with AI enhancements to images, being misconstrued as deliberate attempts to mislead the public.

​

These misinterpretations often serve to amplify mistrust, overshadowing the artist's intentions and creative process.

​

In addition to these issues, the ethical concerns surrounding the manipulation of personal details are growing more prominent. Artists such as The Weeknd and Halsey have faced scrutiny and ethical challenges due to their public personas and the expectations surrounding their private lives.

​

The Weeknd, for example, famously altered his appearance with heavy prosthetics for his After Hours album, an artistic choice meant to create a sense of narrative and provoke thought, yet the media sensationalized this as a form of "deception" or self-sabotage, misrepresenting it as an attempt to mislead fans.

Similarly, Halsey, who has often been open about her struggles with mental health, has faced accusations of "using" her personal trauma for commercial gain, despite consistently advocating for mental health awareness.

Both artists have been caught in a cycle of public misinterpretation, where their personal choices, stage personas, and artistic expressions are conflated and scrutinized without proper context.

​​

This kind of scrutiny raises significant ethical concerns, particularly when it comes to the right to privacy and the need for artists to maintain control over their own narratives.

​

Teaching internet safety, particularly the importance of not sharing personal identity details, is essential in a world where privacy is increasingly difficult to maintain. For artists, this challenge is amplified, as media coverage often prioritizes sensationalism over celebrating creative achievements.

Stage names and carefully crafted public personas offer a means of maintaining privacy and control, ensuring that the focus remains on their work rather than their private lives. These practices are not deceptive; they are essential tools for personal and professional boundaries, offering lessons that can be applied universally to protect oneself in the digital age.

​

Furthermore, teaching internet users to value privacy and avoid oversharing fosters a culture of respect and understanding. By focusing on what truly matters—whether it’s art, ideas, or achievements—society can create a safer and more meaningful digital environment. This not only protects individuals but also allows their contributions to shine without the distraction of undue scrutiny.

Searching for an artist’s real name or personal details, without seeking verification from the artist, is a practice that crosses ethical boundaries.

Journalists and the public alike are often too quick to pass judgment, assuming that an artist’s stage persona or public image is inherently deceptive without fully understanding the artistic and personal choices that led to it.

This behavior is not only an invasion of privacy, but it also undermines the artist’s right to shape their own identity.

​

When unverified claims dominate media coverage, they harm more than just the individual artist—they erode the audience’s ability to trust and connect with the art itself.

By respecting an artist’s boundaries, we honor their creativity and allow their work to speak for itself, free from undue speculation.

Ethical journalism should focus on presenting the artist’s work and its significance, rather than prioritizing personal gossip or misleading narratives.

In an industry that thrives on creativity, artists deserve to be defined by their art, not their personal details.

​

Maybe one day I will share the personal experience I've had with this.

​

​

​